Ok Corey you caught a one game mistake. The bigger point is still there, the SEC had 10 teams go to a bowl, that is 83.3% of our entire conference. Meaning that only 16.7% of our conference did not go to a bowl. So if it give you great solice that with 83.3% of our conference going to a bowl game, that we were only 5 - 5, then so be it. However another way to look at it is that our top 7 teams, or 58.3% of our conference we had a 5 - 2 or 71.4% winning percentage. Not to bad in my book.
The Ducks cheerleaders are my BCS Champions: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/multimedia/photo_gallery/1101/cfb-bcs-championship-cheerleaders/content.1.html?eref=sircrc
Cute girls all, Auburn girls more traditional West coast hotties styling the latest! BTW I guess only USC Song Girls can afford boob jobs! :roll:
I totally concur, the Ducks win by a landslide against Auburn... I have no idea what the gesture of holding the hands together in a circle means, unless it represents how big they think their brain size is...Either way even if their hands were not showing a circle bigger than a walnut is ok with me... :twisted:
Well good thing they didn't have special gloves so that when they make that O for Ohio that they got a penalty!!
Dang those Oregon cheerleaders have to be right at the top of hotness. Yes Corey....I did forget about SC so let's go with 5-2.....which as Bill says is a 71% bowl winning percentage for the top 7. I don't think any other conference had that kind of bowl performance from the top 70% of it's participating teams.
The Mountain West went what...4-1, 5-1? Their lone loss was by the team leaving for the Pac10 who was beaten by the team joining the Mountain West. If we're tossing out mulligans, don't they get to be unbeaten? All I know is, after about 4 weeks of the season it was clear that the SEC was a 1 division race. The SEC was absolutely AWFUL. You can cut/paste those teams to fit any 'top 5 or 7' category that you want, but the East stunk. The West was as good as there is out there. Still, this is the issue. You are the best conference because one half of your conference is good? Also, your numbers just scream out to the condemnation you're trying to avoid.. Almost the entire conference went bowling but the bottom half got slaughtered.. Why are they there?