Apparantly, animal activists have no problem saying, yes. Read story below. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/worldnews.html?in_article_id=443343&in_page_id=1811&ico=Homepage&icl=TabModule&icc=picbox&ct=5
Two points <t>1. It is ok to intervene to end the life unnaturally, but not ok to intervene to keep it alive?<br/> <br/> 2. It lives in a gad dang zoo. How 'wild' is it really? Its a caged animal.</t>
What a bunch of idiots, by using their logic you'd have to kill all the animals in all the Zoo's since none of them could ever interact with their fellow species mates in the wild after living in a Zoo. This is almost as bad as that Time Liz Taylor flew across the country to save some larger than average lobster from the pot. Terry
Believe me, it won't happen again. I just had one inspirational moment. Guys like BDR, JO'Co, et al are born with it.
I wanted to give this thread a nice Bear hug, but then a few thoughts crossed my mind. Do we have conflicting points of zoo? Is this not a Bi-Polar situation ? I hope Knut’s brother is resting peacefully or this will bruin my day.
Sid's pun was a beauty. The rest were pedestrian in comparison. Perhaps ursine a changing of the guard?