Bring back the Draft

Discussion in 'The Back Room' started by jif5, Jul 5, 2006.

  1. jif5

    jif5 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2000
    Messages:
    8,663
    Likes Received:
    29
    Trophy Points:
    48
    We need a military of 4-5 million minimum. We need 5-8 million reserves . Current military is shorthanded and tired. We need to have the manpower to have enough troops on 2 or 3 fronts. Lets do it before its too late. President JIF
     
  2. Terry O'Keefe

    Terry O'Keefe Well-Known Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 1999
    Messages:
    63,900
    Likes Received:
    1,771
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Houston, TX
    No way we could afford that Jif, that's a war time levels. We'd have to reopen tons of closed facilites and build even more new ones. Future warfare will not likely be fought by the millions of men who fought in WWII, they will be fought by small mobile forces with high technology.
     
  3. jif5

    jif5 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2000
    Messages:
    8,663
    Likes Received:
    29
    Trophy Points:
    48
    North Korea has 3 million troops just waiting to drop down into S. Korea. No Hi tech in the world will flush them out with out doing a lot of harm. In Iran ..thats another story..just vaporize the bastards.
     
  4. George Krebs

    George Krebs Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 1999
    Messages:
    13,857
    Likes Received:
    308
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    Howell Twp. NJ
    We have a high tech military. Problem is, we don't like to use that adavantage, preferring instaed to fight the other guy's style.
     
  5. Terry O'Keefe

    Terry O'Keefe Well-Known Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 1999
    Messages:
    63,900
    Likes Received:
    1,771
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Houston, TX
    3 million men with old Soviet era weaponry, just like Saddams Army. That many men couldn't hide from our air attacks and would be decimated. Because of proximity they however would do a lot of damage to South Korea and Seoul no doubt before the 3 million were reduced to a couple of hundred thousand.
     
  6. Motorcity Gator

    Motorcity Gator Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 1999
    Messages:
    17,521
    Likes Received:
    42
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Florida
    If Saddam did in fact have WMDs the question is why didn't he use them? Would he have used them in desperation?

    N. Korea is known to have 5-7 nuclear warheads. What would they do against the superior U.S. weaponry?

    Where does China stand in all of this? Isn't N. Korea more in their side of the world?