College Football 2024

Discussion in 'Sports Board' started by Terry O'Keefe, Jul 23, 2024.

  1. Don Ballard

    Don Ballard Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2001
    Messages:
    8,769
    Likes Received:
    584
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    New Albany Oh
    Henderson and Judkins do make for something we have not experienced for hard running backs for an eternity. I agree after some shffling the offrinsive line has improved. Oregon here we come!
     
  2. BuckeyeT

    BuckeyeT Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 1999
    Messages:
    7,271
    Likes Received:
    180
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    Wilmington, NC
    What a great addition we got in Judkins. I knew he was good, I didn't realize what a beast he is...the guy in the vid below he is face-planting is Iowa 5th year SR and All-American LB Jay Higgins, one of the favorites for the Butkus. Straight monster that kid is ..... to go with the other monster, Tre! O-line has another test this weekend. I think the Iowa front may be more physical, the Ducks may be more athletic and present a little different challenge. I like what I've seen so far, hope they can keep it going

     
    • Like Like x 1
    Last edited: Oct 9, 2024
  3. gipper

    gipper Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 1999
    Messages:
    16,390
    Likes Received:
    461
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    The Villages, FL
    • Informative Informative x 1
  4. Terry O'Keefe

    Terry O'Keefe Well-Known Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 1999
    Messages:
    62,683
    Likes Received:
    1,640
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Houston, TX
    With no NLI what are teams to do with their "verbal" commitments? I don't understand why something that does bring a bit of stability to the recruiting scene suddenly become superfluous? As gipper noted it just makes things very much harder for coaches, what is the end game?
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  5. Scott88

    Scott88 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 1999
    Messages:
    8,084
    Likes Received:
    534
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Arlington, TX
    It's probably a logical follow-on up to the fact that they can't keep kids from transferring.
    Why hold them to a choice before they get there when you can't hold them after they do?
    All part of the destruction of the sport.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  6. kp

    kp Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 1999
    Messages:
    8,807
    Likes Received:
    442
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    Titus Alabama
    I don’t see how any coaching staff will be able to make any plans. They will have no idea who or how many are incoming.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  7. Terry O'Keefe

    Terry O'Keefe Well-Known Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 1999
    Messages:
    62,683
    Likes Received:
    1,640
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Houston, TX
    Glad to see that the powers that be don't want anything to do with private equity.

    NASHVILLE, Tenn. -- Following an "unprecedented" meeting between the SEC and Big Ten on Thursday, the commissioners of both conferences addressed multiple weighty issues facing college athletics and strongly pushed back on recent pitches from private equity groups to help offset increased expenses that will result from the NCAA's expected House settlement.

    SEC, B10: No private funds; football not 'broken'
     
    • Like Like x 1